Our exterminator used three different pesticides, or more specifically acaricides, in our house. One was a “growth regulator” that prevents the mites from molting or reproducing (Williams 2007 pers. com). The other two contained the pyrethroids deltamethrin and pyrethrin (used in flea collars), which kill on contact. A pyrethroid is a man-made chemical that mimics natural pyrethrin found in chrysanthemums, but is less expensive and more stable. To bugs they are poisons that keep open sodium channels in the neuronal membranes so they depolarize and cause paralysis (Ware and Whitacre 2004). (Ironic that in Japan mums are a symbol of long life.) Other active ingredients in one of the pyrethroids were piperonyl butoxide and N-octyl bicycloheptene dicarboximide. The former prevents the mite’s liver from ridding the pyrethroid from the body, making the pyrethroid deadly (Ware and Whitacre 2004). The latter is used to slow its enzymatic breakdown, enhancing its potency (Deer 2002). In the backyard, bifenthrin, another pyrethroid, and orthoboric acid, part of a weather-resistant bait, were used. On the day after the treatment, all the mites were miraculously gone. On the minus side, the pyrethroids kill good insects too, like bees, for which I found evidence.
Other acaricides, such as organophosphates and carbamates, act at the neuromuscular junction (where nerve impulses instruct muscles to contract) to inhibit the activity of cholinesterase. This protein breaks down a neurotransmitter called acetylcholine leaving the nerves constantly depolarized (Mullens et al. 2004).
These mites have been found on temperate regions in all six continents (Smiley 1991). There are many factors that will help their population to expand:
- Global warming: Mites like it warm and moist! They appear not to survive for more than a few days in low humidity (Jacobs 2006).
- Increases in human population lead to more building resulting in more nests on homes. The fact that birds often return to the same nest year after year may compound the problem. Moreover, fewer trees may lead birds to reuse nests, and less nesting materials may lead to recycling of infested materials. Our pest inspector said that what happened to us was quite common (Williams 2007 pers. com.). I have already been asked by the pest company to act as a reference to another family who has an even worse, house-wide infestation. More buildings also mean people living closer together, so mites have more potential victims. We felt badly that our neighbor was itching too.
- The desire to use less and/or less potent pesticides as we learn more about the harmful effects. This leaves one open to reinfestation since complete bird proofing is nearly impossible. Case in point, we had a reoccurrence in our backyard from a family of doves living on the pergola. There is a fine line, or maybe no line, between killing the mites and harm to the host and other creatures nearby.
- Mite resistance to certain acaricides: Researchers at UC Riverside have discovered extreme resistance to pyrethrin in mites infesting commercial poultry in Southern California. And some resistance to organophosphates and carbamates was also found (Mullens et al. 2004).
- The fact that the NFM is a smart, resourceful, and adaptable creature increases its chances of survival. They’ve evolved to use us as a quick meal (Carroll and Young 1994). And who can say that they will never evolve to live on non-bird hosts? One study of the chicken mite that employed an in vitro feeding system showed that while most first generation mites died, subsequent ones were able to survive and reproduce (Bruneau et al. 2001).
- The recent organic farming movement towards free-range chicken makes the mites more difficult to control (McDevitt et al. 2006). And most folks probably don’t want their chickens sprayed with pesticides either.
- Some factors that will hurt them include:
- Decreased wild bird host population (Shwartz 2005).
- Adaptive bird behavior: Birds have developed anti-mite strategies such as alternate colony usage (Chapman and George 1991). Many also build nests from fresh green materials. The Nest Protection Hypothesis states that birds have evolved to use the insecticide abilities of plants to protect against ectoparasites (Clark 1991). Whether or not that is true, new nests certainly slow the mites down to give the nestlings a head start (Pacejka et al. 1996).
- New technologies in biochemistry used in acaricides, along with a more detailed knowledge of mite biology, will help us to eradicate them. There is revival in the latter currently underway in Europe due to acaricide resistance in D. gallinae (Mullens et al. 2004). Last year Scottish researchers developed a proteinase inhibitor mixture that killed chicken mites in the lab (McDevitt 2006). In the UK, there is a proposal to create a mite vaccine for poultry (Anonymous B 2006).
- More public knowledge via the Internet helps householders diagnose and respond more quickly. The County of San Diego’s Department of Environmental Health has a useful website. There is even a site solely dedicated to NFM called birdmites.org.
So which way will the scale tilt? I believe these factors will balance out and that the mites will survive, but not overpopulate. Just like the coevolution of the common cold, it is not in the parasite’s interest to kill the host. Over time, parasites become less destructive and the hosts become more tolerant (Sykes 2007). That is why the cold viruses and the mites who kill die off, and the weak ones survive to eat another day. And the silver lining could be that parasites may enhance the future health of the species since only the strongest birds will survive and reproduce (Loye and Carroll 1995).
To close, Professor Proctor’s husband, Dr. David Walter, a mite expert as well, formerly from the University of Queensland’s Zoology and Entomology Department, said “I feel like a Medieval Monk, keeping the illuminated manuscripts safe during the Dark Ages”. An on-line article describes him as “trying to keep the subject alive as science is swept by molecular mania” (Anonymous A 2000). I hoped to have contributed by lighting a small candle.
Anonymous A. 2000. The University of Queensland. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.uq.edu.au/news/index.html?article=1757, version (02/2000).
Anonymous B. 2006. UK Government. World Wide Web electronic publication.
http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.gov.uk/animal-research/publications-and-reference/001-abstracts/abstracts2-2006/may-2006/187?view=Html, version (6/2006).
Apperson, C. S. and M. Waldvogel. 2002. North Carolina State University. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/ent/notes/Urban/mites.htm, version (08/2002).
Audesirk, T., G. Audesirk, and B. Byers. 2008. Biology: Life on Earth 8th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ. pp. 456-458.
Barrett, J., P. Brophy, H. Wright, J. Hamilton, R. Morphew, and C. Thomas. 2007. Aberystwyth University. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.aber.ac.uk/~mpgwww/Edu/Arthro/ArthTxt1.htm, version (10/2007).
Bennett, C. 1988 and 1989. University of Southampton. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.soton.ac.uk/~ceb/EctoEndodirectory/frontectoendo.htm, version (10/2007).
Brands, S.J. ed. 1989-2007. The Taxonomicon. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/, version (9/2007).
Bruneau, A., A. Dernberg, C. Chauve, and L. Zenner. 2001. First in vitro cycle of the chicken mite, D. gallinae (DeGeer 1778), utilizing an artificial feeding device. Parasitology. 123:583-589.
Bruneau, A., A. Dernberg, C. Chauve, and L. Zenner. 2002. First Report of northern fowl mite O. sylvarium in France. Veterinary Record. 150:413-414.
Burkhardt, F. 2007. Darwin Project. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/darwinletters/namedefs/namedef-815.html, version (10/2007).
Campbell, N. and J. Reece. 2005. Biology 7th Ed. Pearson Education Inc. San Francisco. pp. 656-658.
Carroll, J.F. and K. W. Young. 1994. In vitro feeding of northern fowl mites on beef and swine blood. Entolmol. Exp. Appl. 72:193-195.
Chamberlain, R.W. and R. K. Sikes. 1955. Laboratory investigations of the role of bird mites in the transmission of eastern and western encephalitis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 4:106-118.
Chapman, B. R. and J. E. George. 1991. The effects of ectoparasites on cliff swallow growth and survival. In [Loye, J.E. and M. Zuk eds.] Bird-Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. Oxford University Press. New York. pp. 69-92.
Clark, L. 1991. The nest protection hypothesis. In [Loye, J.E. and M. Zuk eds.] Bird-Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. Oxford University Press. New York. pp. 205-221.
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. 1968. Spiders, Scorpions, Centipedes and Mites. Pergamon Press. Oxford. pp. 226-256.
Deer, H. M. 2002. Pyrethrum, Pyrethrins, and Pyrethroids. Utah Pesticide and Toxic News. Volume XX, Number 7, July 2002.
Foulk, J. D. and J. G. Matthysse. 1965. O. sylviarum (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Wild Birds and Their Nests. Journal of Parasitology. 51(1):126-127.
Gordh, G. and D. H. Headrick. 2001. A Dictionary of Entomology. CABI Publishing. New York. 1032 pp.
Hall, R.D., and W. B. Gross. 1975. Effects of social stress and inherited plasma corticosterone levels in chickens on populations on the northern fowl mite, O. sylviarum. Journal of Parasitology. 61(6):1096-1100.
Jacobs, S. 2006. Penn State Entomology Dept. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.ento.psu.edu/extension/factsheets/birdMites.htm, version (1/2006).
Johnston, D.E. 1982. Acari. In [S. P. Parker ed.] Synopsis and Classification of Living Organisms, Vol 2. McGraw Hill. New York. pp. 111-117.
Kells, S. A. and G. A. Surgeoner. 1997. Sources of Northern Fowl Mite (O. sylviarum) Infestation in Ontario Egg Production Facilities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 6:221-228.
Knee, W. and H. Proctor. 2006. Keys to the Families and Genera of Blood and Tissue Feeding Mites Associated with Albertan Birds. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification. 2:1-18.
Loye, J. and S. Carroll. 1995. Birds, bugs and blood: avian parasitism and conservation. Tree. 10(6):232-235.
Lucky, A.W., C. P. Sayers, J. D. Argus, and A. Lucky. 2001. Avian Mites Acquired From a New Source-Pet Gerbils. Arch Dermatol. 137:167-170.
Luxton, M. 1968. A New Genus and Species of Littoral Mite (Acari: Mesostigmata) from New Zealand. N.Z jl mar. Freshwat. Res. 2:497-504.
Masan, P. 1997. Changes in infestation rate and age structure on Dermanyssus hirundinis and O. sylviarum (Acarina) during nidification and breeding period of penduline tit. J. Med. Entomol. 34:609-614.
Mathews Pound, J. and J. H. Oliver, Jr. 1976. Reproductive Morphology of O. sylviarum. Journal of Parasitology. 62(3):470-474.
McDevitt, R., A. J. Nisbet, and J. F. Huntley. 2006. Ability of a proteinase inhibitor mixture to kill poultry red mite, D. gallinae in an in vitro feeding system. Veterinary Parasitology. 141(3-4):380-385.
Mehlhorn, H. ed. 2001. Encyclopedic Reference of Parasitology. Springer. Berlin. CD-ROM.
Miller, W. V. and F. C. Price. 1977. The Avian Mite, O. sylviarum, on Mammalian Hosts with References to Transmission to Poultry. Journal of Parasitology. 63(3):417.
Minelli, A. and S. Casellato eds. 2001. Giovanni Canestrini: Zoologist and Darwinist. Instituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere, ed Arti. Venice. 605 pp.
Minnifield, N. M., J. Carroll, K. Young, and D. K. Hayes. 1993. Antibody development against northern fowl mites (Acari:Macronyssidae) in chickens. J. Med. Entomol. 30:360-367.
Mullen, G. R. and B. M. O’Connor. 2002. Mites (Acari). In [G. R. Mullen, and L. A. Durden eds.] Medical and Veterinary Entomology. Academic Press. New York. pp. 449-516.
Mullens, B. A., R. K. Velten, N. C. Hinkle, D. R. Kuney, and C. E. Szijj. 2004. Acaricide Resistance in Northern Fowl Mite (O. sylviarum) Populations on Caged Layer Operations in Southern California. Poultry Science. 83:365-374.
Nixon, W. A. 2007. Encyclopedia Britannica. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9110515/acarid, version (10/2007).
Norton, R. A., P. M. Bonamo, J. D. Grierson, and W. A. Shear. 1988. Oribatid mite fossils from a terrestrial Devonian deposit near Gilboa, New York. Journal of Paleontology. 62:259-269.
Orton, D. I., L. J. Warren, and J. D. Wilkinson. 2000. Avian Mite Dermatitis. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology. 25:129-131.
Owen, J. P. and B. A. Mullens. 2004. Influence of heat and vibration on the movement of the Northern Fowl Mite (Acari: Macronyssidae). J. Med Entomol. 41:865-872.
Pacejka, A., E. Santana, R. Given Harper, and C. Thompson. 1996. House Wrens Troglodytes aedon and Nest-Dwelling Ectoparasites: Mite Population Growth and Feeding Patterns. Journal of Avian Biology. 27(4):273-278.
Philips, J. R. 2004. Raptormites. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://raptormites.babson.edu/babson.edu, version (1/2004).
Proctor, H. C. 2004. Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods). Volume 23 No. 2.
Proctor, H. C. and I. Owens. 2000. Mites and birds: diversity, parasitism and coevolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 15:358-364.
Savory, T. 1964. Arachnida. Academic Press. New York. pp. 124-128.
Shearer, D. and R. Wall. 1997. Veterinary Entomology: Arthropod Ectoparasites of Veterinary Importance. Chapman & Hall, London. pp. 89-90.
Shwartz, M. 2005. Stanford University News.World Wide Web electronic publication. http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2005/january12/birds-011205.html, version (1/2005).
Sikes, R. K. and R. W. Chamberlain. 1954. Laboratory Observations on Three Species of Bird Mites. Journal of Parasitology. 40(6):691-697.
Sykes, P. 2007. BIO 107 Fall 2007 Lecture and Lab Notes. Mesa College, San Diego.
Smiley, R. L. 1991. Mites (Acari). In [Gorham J. R. ed.] Insect and Mite Pests in Food. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC. p. 12.
Soler Cruz, M. D., M. C. Vega Robles, J. B. Jespersen, O. Kilpinen, M. Birkett, S. Dewhirst, and J. Pickett. 2005. Scanning electron microscopy of foreleg tarsal sense organs of the poultry red mite, D. gallinae (DeGeer) (Acari:Dermanyssidae). Micron. 36(5):415-421.
Sonenshine, D., D. Taylor, and K. Carson. 1986. Chemically Mediated Behavior in Acari: Adaptions for Finding Hosts and Mates. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 12(5):1091-1108.
Thanukos, A. 2007. University of California, Berkeley. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/arthropodstory, version (10/2007).
Valiente Moro, C., C. Chauve, and L. Zenner. 2007. Experimental infection of Salmonella Enteritidis by the poultry red mite D. gallinae. Veterinary Parasitology. 146(3-4):329-336.
VanDyk, J. ed. 2007. BugGuide. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://bugguide.net/node/view/105429/bgpage, version (4/2007).
Van Ripper III, C. 1991. Parasite communities in wet and dry forest subpopulations of the Hawaii common amakihi. In [Loye, J.E. and M. Zuk eds.] Bird-Parasite Interactions: Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour. Oxford University Press. New York. pp. 140-153.
Walter, D. E., G. Krantz, and E. Lindquist. 1996. The Tree of Life Web Project. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://tolweb.org/Acari/2554/1996.12.13, version 13 (12/1996).
Ware, G.W. and D. M. Whitacre. 2004. The Pesticide Book, 6th ed. Meister Media Worldwide.
Willoughby, OH. p. 496.
Weisbroth, S. 1960. The Differentiation of D. gallinae from O. sylviarum. Avian Diseases. 4(2):133-137.
Williams, C. 2007. Interview with a senior employee of Hearts Pest Management, Inc. La Jolla.